GASC 2016 Presentation Abstracts
June 17, Friday, Kinjo Gakuin University, Satellite Campus, Sakae
11:30-1:00 Session 1: Generative Anthropology and the Western Canon
John Milton on Free Markets and the
Tithing Controversy
Peter Goldman, Westminster College,
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
John Milton opposed state-mandated
tithes and in 1659 he published The Likeliest Means to Remove
Hirelings Out of the Church, an attack on the corruption in
the tithing system. I show that Milton believed that free market
principles would cure the abuses caused by state sponsorship of
ministers' wages.
René Girard’s Shakespeare
Richard van Ort, University of
Victoria, Canada
This paper will examine Girard’s
reading of Shakespeare. Most Shakespeare scholars have ignored
Girard’s major work on Shakespeare, A Theater of Envy. I
will consider the reasons for this inattention. I will also
consider Girard’s (rather pessimistic) conception of modernity,
which I think helps to throw light on Girard’s conception of
Shakespeare. I suggest that Girard’s use of Shakespeare is based
on a paradox: Shakespeare is at once a great exposer of the myth
of romantic desire yet also a victim of it. The remainder of the
paper will explore the consequences of this view of Shakespeare
for mimetic theory in general and Shakespeare in particular.
With respect to the latter, Girard postulates a "two audience"
theory of Shakespeare. With respect to the former, we can see
that Girard’s ambivalence toward Shakespeare is symptomatic of
his ambivalence toward the aesthetic, which remains an
untheorized category in Girard’s core hypothesis.
2:00-3:30 Session 2: Generative Anthropology, Globalization, and
the Social Scene
"It’s Not Enough that I Succeed;
Others Must Fail": In Search of a Theory of Identification.
Marina Ludwigs, Stockholm University,
Sweden
In my presentation, I would like to
put side-by-side the theory of Generative Anthropology and the
theory of "comeuppance" by William Flesch as two theories of
narrative desire and satisfaction. Both express important
anthropological insights, and yet they are the opposite of each
other, in some sense. Generative Anthropology (and Girardian
mimetic theory) connect narrative satisfaction with the
protagonist’s obtaining his object of desire (or a peripheral
position acceding to centrality), while the theory of
comeuppance discovers that witnessing the scene of a
transgressor being punished (or an usurper of the center being
forced back to the periphery) gives a very satisfactory
narrative conclusion to a story. Flesch bases his theory on the
study of how animals (but especially humans) track each other’s
behavior with their eyes, while the participants of the mimetic
triangle enter the fray, actively vying for the desired object.
In other words, in the first case, the participants remain on
the periphery, while on the other, they compete for the center.
I will give some suggestions as to how we could integrate these
two models by looking at various theories of identification.
Post-Hierarchical Culture in
Media-Based Creative Collectives: Sketching Originary Analyses
Benjamin Matthews, Western Sydney
University, Australia
….So full of shapes is fancy
That it alone is high fantastical.
_Twelfth Night
I intend to discuss existing uses of
the concept of "post-hierarchy" (particularly in the literature
that engages with organisational structures), as it has emerged
in the light of the influence of access to globally mediated
cultural exchange.
My argument goes along these lines:
post-hierarchical culture as it is currently understood is
certainly secular, and relies on effective mediation of the
implicit sacrality of scenes of culture that harness the potency
in emergent patterns of human behaviour made possible by
publicly mediated dialogic interaction.
Creative collectives are able to do so
by conducting such discourse on public scenes of culture that
are digitally mediated via the affordances of a range of
platforms. In this way, the liminal quality of the publicly
staged conversation can be negotiated, and the dialogue
sustained as it is simultaneously recorded to become an
indelible record of this/these event/s. Thus, the usual
limitations of scale (in terms of the number of participants)
and volatility that marks dialogic interaction conducted in the
public sphere are disrupted, with the paradoxical effect of
destabilising the structures that reinforce hierarchy.
Creative collectives are an incubator
for this mode of interaction, and prospectively, microcosmic
presentations of what might considered a scalable phenomenon,
able to be transplanted to other organisations with structures
that currently operate according to hierarchical interaction
defined by tradition established during the (presently
unfolding, possibly waning) primarily analog, highly localised
and destructible discursive epoch.
Scenes of Distress: Reflections on
Francis Fukuyama’s "End of History"
Matthew Taylor, Kinjo Gakuin
University, Nagoya, Japan
Eric Gans has consistently endorsed
Francis Fukuyama’s "End of History" thesis that liberal
democracy and free markets constitute the ultimate if not final
system of human organization. (Gans is much less indulgent
toward Fukuyama’s conjectures about the "last man," from
Nietzsche, whose chief problem will be ennui.) While
Fukuyama was indeed often persuasive on geopolitics and
globalization, I argue that at the societal level his
projections are contradicted by demographic and psychosocial
trends in Japan. In this context, I also re-consider Fukuyama’s
"last man," as an index not of heroism, but happiness.
Fukuyama himself made much of Japan as
a kind of advance guard for world historical developments, but
Japan’s "bubble economy" was already collapsing when his thesis
came out. A continuous period of stagnation and economic
insecurity has followed, along with persistently elevated levels
of suicide and depression. The widespread psychological
distress, excellently documented by Junko Kitanaka (Depression
in Japan), has ushered in the trend of mass palliative
medication and to some extent redefined the terms of social
existence itself. There has also been a rise in social
isolation: a substantial number of people are removing
themselves from society, or any social interaction at all.
Finally, the burgeoning population of the elderly has presented
increasingly urgent, even intractable problems of care in a
society no longer buffered by the bonds of extended families or
traditional associations. Given these demographics, democratic
mandates tend more and more to be socialist in nature.
Fukuyama was not wrong to put Japan,
and by extension East Asia, at the cutting edge of history, but
developments like these call into question the sustainability of
his "post-historical" future. Advanced consumer culture seems to
manifest a disconcertingly literal interpretation of "last man."
3:45-5:15 pm Session 3: GA, Girard,
and Metaphysics
From Dreams of a Spirit-Seer to
The Critique of Pure Reason: Kant’s Changing Relations to
Metaphysics
Jeremiah Alberg, International
Christian University, Tokyo, Japan
In this presentation I will explore
some of the implications of the changes Kant made in his use of
imagery concerning metaphysics. In articles published last year
I used R. Girard’s mimetic theory to explore some of the
conceptual implications of Kant characterizing metaphysics as a
"coquette" in Dreams of a Spirit-Seer (1766). In this
writing Kant first defined metaphysics as "a science of the
limits of human reason." But Dreams left its readers
confused. What followed was approximately 15 years (broken only
by the imposed publication of the Dissertation) of
struggle with the questions Kant had uncovered in Dreams.
I think one step in understanding the First Critique is
to take a careful look at the change in the images Kant uses
when speaking of metaphysics. So I will summarize the results of
my earlier research and use it as a basis for reflecting on this
change in the front matter of the Critique of Pure Reason
(1781/1787). There Kant refers to metaphysics claim to being the
"Queen" of the sciences. In the First Critique Kant wants
to explore the validity of this claim.
Ostensive Dreams and Declarative
Nightmares
Amir Khan, LNU-MSU College of
International Business
Within the internal dialectal workings
of the declarative utterance can be found not merely the source
of infinity, but from there the source of (some infinite)
Being—hence ideas, or metaphysics which lack, according to Eric
Gans, an "ethical lacuna." Isolating the nature of this lacuna
(which is supposedly restored?) once we are free of metaphysics
via asserting the existence of the ostensive utterance is what I
am hoping to get at here.
In short, what does merely proposing
the ostensive utterance at the origin of language do? By
understanding, say, intellectually, the operative power of the
ostensive, are we suddenly more humane, more ethical? Is this
all that is required to free us from the dialectical power of
the declarative, of metaphysics? What is so dangerous (i.e.
anti-ethical) about declarative utterances anyway? Why is Gans
so suspicious, for example, of Plato’s "conceptual turn" in the Gorgiasand
the Republic?
5 :30-7:00 Session
4: Generative Anthropology and Origins
Opening a Dialogue between Kinji
Imanishi and Generative Anthropology
Andrew Bartlett, English Department,
Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Canada
Kinji Imanishi (1902-1992) enjoyed an
illustrious career in Japan as a public intellectual –
biologist, anthropologist, scientist, mountain climber. He has
in recent decades gained some recognition in the West as the
founder of the globally influential Japanese school of
primatology. Untroubled by human-animal dualisms and defiant of
Darwinian dogma, Imanishi and his students used techniques from
the outset that have since become standard in primatological
research, in field work carried out years before the rebel Jane
Goodall tried them out (to the scandal of orthodox
behaviorists). Imanishi's hugely popular 1941 text Seibutsu
no Sekai (The World of Living Things) was translated into
English in 2001. Focusing on that book, I hope to introduce
Imanishi to Western conference attendees and, relying on the
mediations of Pamela Asquith and Frans de Waal, zero in on some
of the ways his work might challenge Generative Anthropology's
self-presentation as a universal way of thinking, especially
given the anthropology-cosmology opposition fundamental to GA
but alien to Imanishi's vision of the world of living things.
Nietzsche as Theorist of Origins
Kieran Stewart, University of Western
Sydney, Australia
The aim of this paper is to
demonstrate - through the lens of generative anthropology - that
Friedrich Nietzsche is first and foremost a theorist of origins;
that is, as Gans contends, Nietzsche generates a particular
scene of origin. Indeed, Nietzsche’s early work contains much
speculation about origins, particularly the origin of language.
In the history of Nietzsche scholarship and criticism, this is
rarely noted. The concerns at large in his early works permeate
the later works, even direct or orient the later works.
Therefore, I will offer a principle for reading Nietzsche, a way
of seeing his oeuvre as a whole. My reading of Nietzsche,
starting from his early period, will demonstrate that his very
early ideas on "the instinct of language" and "pure metaphor"
are the foundational themes for his philosophy as a whole. There
is a double approach in reading Nietzsche, however. The first is
to identify how Nietzsche’s later works are oriented by
his early theory of the origin of language. The second way of
reading Nietzsche is to contrast and compare his work to the
work of Eric Gans, who bears similar theoretical posturing’s in
terms of understanding the human from first premises.
Gans minimal theory on the origin of
the human will be used as a yardstick to Nietzsche’s theory on
the origin of language. What is ultimately at stake between
Nietzsche and Gans’s divergent ideas on the emergence of
language is indeed the question of the ethical. Gans considers
language to be the foundation of the ethical. Nietzsche, on the
other hand, calls for the suspension of the ethical in order to
"produce new metaphors." I will demonstrate that Nietzsche’s
earlier works on the origin of language orient his later ideas
on morality, religion, science, and so forth.
June 19, Sunday, Kinjo Gakuin
University, Main Campus, N2-111
10:00-11:00 am Session 5: Japan in Art, History, and Legend
セッション5 日本の美術、歴史、伝説
Guest
Presentations by the Kinjo Occult Research
Group
Mastering the Visualization of Heroic
Narratives: The
Shutendōji Emaki
in the Edo period
大名家における英雄譚絵巻の所有:江戸時代の酒呑童子絵巻
Aya Ryusawa 龍澤 彩 Department
of Japanese Language and Literature, Kinjo Gakuin University日本語日本文化学科 金城学院大学
From medieval Japan, “Shutendōji”
tells the story
of how Minamoto Raikō and his retainers quelled the tale’s
namesake monster. This story was pictorialized as scroll
paintings (emaki) or as illustrated books. Many daimyō warriors
in the Edo period owned such renditions, as did the Owari
Tokugawa family, the lord of Nagoya castle, who possessed a
number of books and scrolls of the “Shutendōji” narrative. For
these warriors, “Shutendōji” was not only fiction, but also a
tale of their ancestor’s heroic deeds, as the Tokugawa
positioned themselves as the descendants of the Seiwa Genji, as
did Minamoto Raikō. Moreover, “Shutendōji” can be read as a myth
about a leader who forces deviant figures into submission, as it
recalls the existence of sacrificial victims, which Girard
states “can be slayed without the risk of retaliation.” From
this point of view, those scroll paintings of “Shutendōji” in
the collection of Owari Tokugawa family thus acted as tools at
that time to confirm their authority and legitimacy for daimyō
warriors, or men of power.
中世に成立した『酒呑童子』は、大江山あるいは伊吹山に棲むという鬼「酒呑童子」を、源頼光ら武士達が退治するという物語で、多数絵画化され、絵巻や絵本として享受された。江戸時代の大名家のコレクションの中にはしばしば「酒呑童子絵巻」が含まれており、尾張徳川家の蔵品目録にも複数の「酒呑童子絵巻」が記録されている。徳川家は、酒呑童子を退治した源頼光と同じ清和源氏の末裔を名乗っており、「酒呑童子」はフィクションでありながら、象徴的な先祖の英雄譚でもあったのだろう。「酒呑童子」は、共同体から逸脱した存在を力によって調伏させる物語として読むこともでき、ジラールが述べるところの「報復の危険をおかすことなく叩き殺すことのできる」供犠の存在を想起させる。その点からも、時の権力者たる大名家にとっては、視覚化された絵巻という「モノ」として所持することは、為政者としての正統性を一族の中で確認し、継承していくという象徴的な意味があったと捉えたい。
The Birth of a Myth: Civil War and
Sacrifice in Early Meiji Japan
神話の誕生:初期明治日本における内戦と犠牲
Kenshin Kirihara 桐原
健真
It is often said that the
modernization of Japan was a smooth and peaceful transition.
However, in fact, the Meiji restoration did not prove to be
successful without sparking a huge civil war, the likes of which
Japan had not seen in four hundred years. This was called the
Boshin Civil War (1868 – 1869), fought between the pro-Shogunate
army and the New-government army. After this civil war, with a
front extending over the eastern part of J apan,
the New-government enshrined more than three thousand fallen
soldiers as the tutelary deities of “their own nation” in Tokyo
Shōkonsha (the shrine to summon souls),
which is now the controversial Yasukuni Shrine. It can be said
that they were sacrifices to establish the new régime of the so
called "Meiji State." However, there was a stringent rule to
sort the souls of dead soldiers, since, as with Valhalla, not
all fallen soldiers were enshrined in this shrine. This was the
birth of the myth of modern Japan. This paper will describe the
construction of this myth by throwing light on the relation
between enshrining and using dead soldiers as sacrifices.
しばしば日本の近代化は円滑にして平和裏な進行であったといわれる。しかしながら、実際には、明治維新は、それまでの 400年間に日本が目の当たりにすることがなかった大規模な内戦無しに成功をもたらすことができなかった。この内戦は、旧幕軍と新政府軍とによる戊辰戦争(1868-1869)と言われる。戦線を東日本全域に展開したこの内戦の後に、新政府は三千以上の戦没者を「彼ら自身の国」を護る神として東京招魂社(魂を呼び戻すための東京にある神社。現在物議を醸している靖国神社)に祀った。彼らを「明治国家」と呼ばれる新体制を樹立するための犠牲であったと言ってもよい。しかし、すべての戦没者がこのヴァルハラのような神社に祀られたわけではないように、そこには戦死者の魂を選別する厳しい論理が存在していた。それは、近代日本における神話の誕生であった。本発表は、招魂と犠牲としての戦死者との関係に光を当てることによって、この神話の構造を明らかにするものである。
The Haunted Mansion and Woman:
Otherworldly Apparitions in the Modern Cities of Japan
化物屋敷と〈女〉:日本の近代都市に出現する異世界
Shoko Komatsu 小松
史生子
We have an oral tradition, still
remaining in various parts of Japan, of a haunted mansion called
"dish mansion." The ghost of a woman appears night after night
at the mansion and brings a curse on the family who cruelly
murdered her and threw her into a well at the estate on
suspicion of breaking their family heirloom dishes. There is
also an urban legend in Tokyo called "the woman of Ikebukuro,"
which was passed down up to the Showa era until the 1980s.
Whenever an unnatural phenomenon occurred at a house, they found
that one of the maidservants was a young woman from Ikebukuro in
Tokyo. This is a modification of the dish mansion legend. In
this paper, I would like to analyze Japanese characteristics of
mysteries found within the typology of "woman," "mansion" and
"unnatural phenomenon" in order to disclose a narrative of a
female sacrifice offered for a family, with reference to
Girard’s Violence and the Sacred.
日本各地に残る皿屋敷という伝承は、一種の化物屋敷の伝承である。家宝の皿を割ったために惨殺され井戸に投げ込まれた女の霊が夜な夜な現れ、その家に祟りをなすというものだ。一方、東京では「池袋の女」という都市伝説が、昭和の頃まで語り継がれてきている。家に怪異現象が起きるので調べてみると、下女や女中に池袋出身の若い女が必ずいたというものである。これも一種の皿屋敷伝説の変形である。こうした、〈家〉と〈怪異現象〉と〈女〉という怪異の日本的パターンを、ジラールの供儀の解釈を参照軸にして、「家の供物となる女」の物語として考察したい。
1:00-2:30
pm Session 6: Generative Anthropology and Religious Philosophy
of Asia
GA, Buddhism and the Romantics
Ian Dennis, University of Ottawa,
Canada
What GA has perhaps most saliently
offered students of Romanticism is a way of understanding and
analysing the nexus of desire and the aesthetic—hypothesizing a
common human experience of these two phenomena and delineating
with precision, tracing but limiting, that which cannot
and should not be expressed other than as paradox.
In The Philosophy of Desire in the
Buddhist Pali Canon (2005) David Webster, in common with
many commentators on Buddhism, stresses its pragmatic character,
and speaks of it teaching its devotees how they "might become
more skilled practitioners of wanting" ( 145). Generative
anthropologists may well hear in this rather resonant phrase the
human project writ large—certainly the project of any and all of
us who seek, who entertain the possibility of human progress.
The greatest of all human inventions, the sign, is very
precisely a praxis of safer and more productive wanting, a means
of accommodating ever more wanting, and more having. More
having and more wanting, of course, are not really the terms in
which Buddhism’s teachings have typically been framed, to say
the least, and to seek to grasp just what kinds of skills
Buddhism might be offering is to ask, in effect, whether it can
co-exist with, let alone contribute to the ethical development
of modernity .
For all its resistance to the market
world’s preoccupation with selfhood and identity, though, might
there indeed be ways in which Buddhism’s vision of aesthetic
contemplation, the posture it offers its practitioners, models
an accommodation with modernity-- through ostensible or
paradoxical denial-- similar or parallel to that provided by the
market defiance or "constitutive hypocrisy" (as Eric Gans calls
it) of Romanticism?
Generative Anthropology in the Cosmic
Realms of the Mahabharata
Magdalena Złocka-Dąbrowska,
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Warsaw,
Poland
The objective of the paper is to
discuss Eric Gans’ views on Generative Anthropology with
reference to the Mahabharata -
the great Sanskrit epic of
the Bhārata dynasty.
The Mahabharata offers one of the first instances of
theorizing about "just
war",
illustrating many of the standards that could be debated
according to Gans’s universal claims. My analysis will set out
from George Dumézil’s studies, whose whole
massive output can be taken as a stream of debating language and
violence in reference to scenic imagination, including the
Mahabharata. I assume that the Mahabharata, viewed as
the essence of the Veda, constitutes a cumulative
collection of stories, poems and legends which became an example
of never-ending series of originary events, mimetic rivalry,
destruction of a victim into sparagmos
and verbal deferral narratives - all creating
essential parts of different aspects of the originary scene. The
supernatural beings, divinities, demons and heroes are staged in
mythical performances as an "aide-mémoire" of the scenic
scenario incarnated in Brahma’s order, as a cognitive constancy
of human being. In analyzing Dumézil’s review of this
Indian textual tradition one visualizes Gans’ "scenic
imagination" present in this cosmic universe from its
beginnings.
2:45-4:15 Session 7: Comparative Literature, Religion, and
Mimetic Anthropology
Beethoven's Music and Dostoyevsky's
Themes: A Curious Mix in A Clockwork Orange
Izumi Dryden and Laurence Dryden,
Associates, Institute for the Study of Christian Culture
The best known novel by the
twentieth-century British writer and composer Anthony Burgess
may be A Clockwork Orange (1962), which remains
controversial largely because of its problematic adaptation to a
film of the same title (1971) directed by Stanley Kubrick.
As the title of our presentation
suggests, Burgess structured his novel with references to
Beethoven, his favorite composer, and to Dostoyevsky, whose
novel Crime and Punishment Burgess read while preparing
to write A Clockwork Orange. Burgess’s preoccupations
with the importance of free will in choosing between good and
evil resonate within his 1962 novel and indeed throughout much
his corpus.
Today we wish to examine the dynamics
of these and other cultural elements in Burgess’s novel in
relation to René Girard’s study of Dostoyevsky, Resurrection
from the Underground.
How to Read Religious Poems
Anthropoetically (Using Examples from Gerard Manley Hopkins and
Kobayashi Issa)
Edmond Wright, Independent Scholar,
Cambridge, The United Kindgdom
In my 2015 paper at the GASC
conference I analysed Wordsworth’s Immortality Ode from an
anthropoetic point of view. I was inevitably led to trace the
source of its justification of immortality beyond its immediate
commitment to a divine origin. The reconstruction — if I may
call it that, since it is crucially not a deconstruction
— attempted to present a justification that retained the
power of Wordsworth’s poem, even enhance it for our time,
without falling into the trap awaiting that kind of atheist who
is unwilling to search in such religious utterance for a
motivation we can share without any danger of superstition.
There is therefore a key challenge in turning the same spotlight
upon so manifestly religious poet as Gerard Manley Hopkins,
particularly as he foregrounds his own theological bases in his
poems. Specifically there will be an analysis of his notions of
‘inscape’ and ‘instress’, with the sonnet ‘As kingfishers catch
fire’ as the prime example. To conclude, the focus will pass to
a single haiku written by Kobayashi Issa, one which embodies in
the abundance of its ambiguity a parallel power.
Follow us on Twitter
ツイッターでのフォローもお願いします
|